So you see what it takes to get me to write. There have been many things I wanted to write about over the last little bit. But I've been so doggone busy. The Google Reader imminent shutdown really made me want to write. But this... this makes me write. You can see what's near and dear to my hard: Podcasts.
The internet is abuzz with the the news of Podcasts 1.2. <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/2031574/hands-on-podcasts-1-2-is-the-one-apple-should-have-shipped.html">Chris Breen has a good rundown</a> of the new app. And I agree that this is the version that should have shipped in that it is far better than the previous app. But it still has some serious flaws that make it not worth using for me. Believe me, I want to use it, I want it to work. I was genuinely excited for the update. The addition of playlists stations is nice and brings it on par with Instacast in that way. And the stilly and quaint reel to reel playback screen is gone, for better or worse (I sort of liked it, but it was a wee bit hard to use).
Here is my biggest frustration. The reason I want this to work is because I spend as much time working at my Macintosh computer as I do out and about with my iOS device. iTunes, with which my phone syncs every night when I plug it in, has podcast subscription capabilities. But I rarely plug my phone directly into my computer. It syncs overnight and so podcasts could sync that way, but I might work at my computer for a couple hours, then head out in my car and want to pick up my podcasts where I left off. Without a physical sync this was impossible. And what if I subscribe to a new podcast on one of the devices? It's cable (or Wi-Fi sync) time to get everything on the same page.
Apple is touting full subscription sync for this version of the app, but here, as I have found, is the rub: that subscription syncing is only between iOS devices, NOT between iOS and it's sync master, iTunes (isn't that quite odd? iTunes syncs with the iOS, but only iOS devices can sync podcasts with each other over the air). This is growing beyond frustrating. Let me explain my experience.
Being excited as I was for this new version of the app, I went and downloaded it, and added a couple of my favorite podcasts to the app. I let the latest episodes download, then I fired up iTunes and waited, and waited, and waited. No podcasts were added to the podcasts section of iTunes. This must be some sort of mistake. So I closed iTunes, forced the podcasts app on the iPhone to refresh and tried again. Still nothing. So I manually subscribed to the podcasts in iTunes and played the latest episode for a few minutes. To my great delight (perhaps the only delightful part of this experience), even though the subscriptions don't sync over the air, the playback position does IF both devices have subscribed to the same podcast and downloaded the same episode. Yay.
So then I subscribed to a couple podcasts on iTunes. As expected from my experience trying it the other way, these podcasts did not automatically show up in the podcast app on iOS. A manual sync with a cable did make them show up. But here is the rub. THE SUBSCRIPTION SWITCH IN THE IOS APP DID NOT GET TURNED ON. You have to manually do that. So even though the podcast was synced over from the iTunes library, the podcast app does not consider that a subscription, it's just sort of parked there.
<img src="/images/uploads/IMG_9178.png" alt="">
LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME!
This does not seem that hard to get right. I don't understand why Apple is making this so painful? I don't get it. I want the features to work as advertised.
Here is what else I would be giving up to switch away from Instacast:
<ul>
<li>Push Notifications for new episodes</li>
<li>Show notes (why does Apple refuse to support this when this is such a standard now?)</li>
<li>More robust media management</li>
</ul>
I must admit that I am not thrilled with Instacast 3's slightly more dumbed down media management, but it is still way better than what Apple's app offers.
And I am excited because Instacast has teased that a Mac client is in the works with full sync. As a podcast geek and power user that will make me extremely happy. I will finally have what I have been longing for these many years.
But the real bottom line for me is that there are still not good and easy podcast solutions for the average person. Apple's app still adds complication by not working quite as advertised, and by trying to hard to make things easy. Sometimes trying to make things easy adds unexpected complication. And solutions like Instacast simple are not easy for mainstream consumers to grasp. Podcasts remain just out of reach for many average consumers in my opinion.
What is so maddening is that Apple could make this so easy and so good, but they just can't seem to manage it.
P.S. That icon is still hideous.
<hr>
Here is the orginal article I wrote about podcasts, and a quick follow up to that.
<ul>
<li><a href="/blog/2012/06/27/podcasts">Podcasts »</a></li>
<li><a href="/blog/2012/06/28/podcasts-a-quick-follow-up">Podcasts - A Quick Follow Up »</a></li>
</ul>

Apple's Podcast App Revisited


I have, since the day the iPhone came out, and I subsequently purchased one that same day, loathed all note taking options. Obviously the first iteration of iPhone OS iOS did not have third party apps or any ability to sync notes of any kind. It had a notes app and any notes one took there were forever siloed in that app. And any notes one took in any form on a Mac were also not able to be synced to one's iPhone. There have been various web based solutions, none of them good.
With third party apps came note taking apps. I have never been happy with any of them. I've tried various services and apps, like them all a little for a time, found them frustrating and moved on. For a while, I used Evernote. And to some extent I liked it. But both the Mac app and the iOS app have been through various stages of bugginess. I have had trouble with sync between the apps, sometimes, notes simply, stubbornly refused to sync at all. Additionally, I found the interface for both confusing and cluttered.
The last straw for Evernote came when the app ate a very VERY important note. I was editing the note on my phone when the app crashed. When I returned to the app, the note was gone. My computer had been left on, connected to the internet in another location so it naturally synced the lack of note and that was that. I could never get that note back. I left Evernote.
For a time I used the built in Mac and iOS notes app, which strangely, uses an IMAP mailbox on your mail server to sync. I find this to also be buggy and unreliable, but it never offered to flat out eat any of my notes and the interface is much less cluttered. But in the end, it just was not powerful enough.
I moved on to Simplenote. It's too simple, and syncing can again be a bit of a pain.
So in frustration, about a week ago, I complained on Twitter about the state of note taking and syncing.
<blockquote>
It’s 2013, can we please have a really good note taking app that syncs between computers and phones now? So far I hate all the current ones.
— TJ Draper (@tjdraperpro) <a href="https://twitter.com/tjdraperpro/status/297473239645569024">February 1, 2013</a>
</blockquote>

I received several recommendations to try Evernote again, they've been through a major overhaul and are rock solid now. I was skeptical, but thought it could not hurt since I was simply not happy with any note syncing solution/app in any capacity.
And I’ve been using Evernote since February 1 and I'm impressed. The interface has been seriously cleaned up, note syncing is rock solid and instantaneous (so far... knock on wood), and it is doing almost exactly what I want a note app and note syncing to do:
<ul>
<li>Multiple Notebooks</li>
<li>Tags</li>
<li>Nice, Lion Mail style wide screen layout on the mac, very intuitive interface on the iPhone</li>
<li>Nice, simple and clean, WYSIWYG note editing (in the past I found the WYSIWYG note editor to be very buggy, that seems to be gone)</li>
<li>A lot less cluttery feeling.</li>
</ul>
In short, if you have not used Evernote in a while due to frustrations with syncing and the interface, give it another try, it has changed much for the better and so far, this is the happiest I have ever been with note taking and syncing.

Note Taking and Syncing

<blockquote>
Following reports that <a href="http://bgr.com/2013/02/04/ios-6-1-jailbreak-release-date-315664/">an untethered jailbreak was finally set to be made available for iOS 6.1 users on Monday</a>, the Evad3rs Jailbreak Team has made their jailbreak tool evasi0n available for download. The tool jailbreaks <a href="http://bgr.com/tag/apple">Apple’s</a> (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AAPL">AAPL</a>) <a href="http://bgr.com/tag/iphone-5">iPhone 5</a>, iPhone 4S, iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, <a href="http://bgr.com/tag/ipad-mini">iPad mini</a>, all iPad models and third-, fourth- and fifth-generation iPod touch models running iOS 6.0 or iOS 6.1.
</blockquote>
Wait, is jailbreaking still a thing? I really could not possibly care any less about this.

Zach Epstein writing on BGR

iOS 6.1 Untethered Jailbreak Now Available

So here it is, the BlackBerry 10 OS no the BlackBerry Z10 hardware. It's taken RIM FOREVER to get here, but I'll say this, I have not seen anything that really looked competitive with the iPhone like this since the Palm Pre OS (was it called Web OS I think?). Yes Android folks, you read that right.
The one thing though is, I'm not sure about all these swiping gestures for key features — they just aren't discoverable. That said, this looks like it has real potential. Also, this is notifications done right. I mean seriously, I don't have many complaints with iOS, but one of my big ones is that Apple STILL doesn't have notifications right (and again for you Android people, neither does Android). But I like the look of this notification system.

BlackBerry 10 vs. iPhone 5

<blockquote>
Skeuomorphism -- the use of real world design in a digital context -- has been a target lately. It's also been lumped together with heavy design, or skin, to the point of being completely misunderstood. At the extreme, this "skeuomorphic" melange has been held up as an example of iOS being boring, outdated, and bereft of innovation. In more reasonably terms, it's looked at as something that can be useful, but has perhaps been overused. I've gone on record as saying I think there are far more important things Apple needs to do in iOS 7 than wiping the world clean of skeuomorphism, both <a href="http://www.imore.com/never-mind-iphone-6-and-ipads-next-2013-its-ios-7-and-icloud-matter-most">here on the site</a> and in a <a href="http://www.imore.com/imore-show-333-apple-doomed-again">podcast rant</a>. But let's imagine for a moment it is on the agenda. That Apple's new head of all design, hardware and software, Jony Ive, was set to impose a new, unified, Aluminium theme. That, just like the Scarlet Witch in House of M, he whispered "No more Skeuomorphs."
Instead of arguing in the abstract about how much better or worse it would be, let's mock it up and see what could that look like…
</blockquote>
And:
<blockquote>
I'm still of the opinion that it's less about skeuomorphism or it's opposite, digital authenticity, than it is about usability. In some cases, skeuomorphism helps make things discoverable, approachable, and engaging. In others, it just gets in the way.
</blockquote>
I'm really pretty much in love with the mockup of Game Center. Yes, as pointed out, it's a little more generic, but much, much easier on the eyes!
Also, I loved <a href="https://512pixels.net/2013/01/skeuomorphic-free/">Stephen Hackett's comments on Rene's article</a>:
<blockquote>
The silver UI in Rene’s post can be found in iOS’s built-in Music and Maps app now. While I’m all for Apple getting rid of stitched leather and linen, remember what happened before Apple unified an OS so tightly?
<img src="/images/blog/2013/01/29/2013-01-26-brushed-metal.png" alt="2013-01-26-brushed-metal.png">
Oh God.
</blockquote>

Rene Ritchie on iMore

Imagining All Aluminium iOS 7

I really love <a href="http://reederapp.com/iphone/">Reeder for iPhone</a>. Silvio Rizzi has done a great job and created 3 wonderful apps (iPhone, iPad, and Mac version. Developers who don’t make complimentary app counterparts on all three platforms, please take note!)
I really don’t know what I would do without Reeder, I use it every day, all day long on both my Mac and my iPhone (and I’m sure I would use it on my iPad if I had one). But there is one thing that bothers me with the recent update to 3.x. The method of navigation back out of a feed item has changed. In the 2.x versions, there was an ever present “back” navigation button up in the top left. This was fine, it always functioned well and never bothered me in the slightest. And getting back to the list from an item was easy and discoverable.
3.x has changed this behavior. There is a back button up in the top left. But it sticks to the top of the item so that when you scroll, it immediately scrolls up out of sight. This is ostensibly to make more screen real estate for reading. The problem is getting back to the list of items is harder and less discoverable.
However, despite the fact that this new method is far less discoverable, there is a new method for getting out of an item and back to the list of unread items. That is a swipe to the right with a single finger. In theory this is a great compliment (not replacement) for the back button. We can talk all day about how bad it is to replace a friendly and easily discoverable method of navigation with a less discoverable method, but that’s not even the problem. The problem I am having is that almost every single time I try to swipe out of an item I have finished reading to get back to the list, I have to try two or three times. The problem seems to be that Reeder has trouble distinguishing if I’m trying to scroll or swipe. On top of which it is the only app that functions this way. If I spend to much time in Reeder I get confused when I go to another app of similar “item list, item” construction and try to use the gesture to get back to the list (Mail, Instapaper etc.). If I haven’t been in Reeder for a while then it often takes me a few seconds to remember how to go back. It may seem like a minor annoyance, but believe me it’s adding up.
Speaking of Instapaper, it has a back gesture too, a two finger swipe to the right. But it is not the only way to get back and I rarely use it because it’s different from every other system app, and different again from Reeder. Where Instapaper is manageable, and why I have no problem with this feature is that Instapaper does not replace the back button navigation with this gesture. Instead, it’s an addition. And yes, Instapaper hits all navigation and goes full screen, but a tap anywhere will bring the navigation back up. And when you get to the end of an item, the navigation automatically comes back up.
So this is my complaint. And as much as I love Reeder, and even love pretty much everything else about the 3.x update, this one issue is so hurting my user experience that I’m quite frustrated.

A Reeder Complaint

<blockquote>
In the email, the site owner said that their website made $75,000 since last June, when Apple released the first beta of iOS 6 to developers. “We do not believe our service was infringing and our services did not violate their guidelines for iOS 6″, the site owner commented, adding that they will soon launch another similar site, “with better and more secure data lines to handle Apple”.
</blockquote>
Riiiggghhhht. No infringement going on here… Did they even bother to read the developer agreement?

Federico Viticci

Beta UDID Activation Crack Down

Yesterday, Apple released a new app for iPhone and iPad called <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/podcasts/id525463029">Podcasts</a>. Several people whom I respect have heaped praise upon it and honestly I’m not sure why. I can see how this is a major improvement if you have been using iTunes to manage podcasts and syncing them from iTunes to your iDevice. But while this is a major improvement over that scenario, this is by no means a good app.
Don’t get me wrong, there are aspects of the interface that I love. The player screen itself is really awesome.
<img src="http://buzzingpixel.com/images/uploads/IMG_0254.jpg" alt="IMG 0254" title="IMG_0254.jpg">
However, there are some problems.
<h2>Subscribing to Podcasts</h2>
It’s just a bit clunky and confusing for an Apple designed interface. I’ve seen worse, but it’s definitely clunky. That said, I was able to find a couple of the podcasts I listen to and subscribe to them.
Now one of the big features I was looking forward to:
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Optionally sync your favorite episodes from iTunes on your Mac or PC</li>
<li>Sync your episode playback for seamless transition between devices</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
The wording here made me think this was all going to be happening over the air in the way that Instacast syncs over the air between iOS devices. So I waited for the podcasts I had subscribed to, to show up in iTunes. After a while I realized that wasn’t going to happen. So I told iTunes to sync my phone. Sure enough, the podcasts then showed up in iTunes. However, my playback position was not synced. What in the world? I tried everything to get playback position to sync between iTunes and iPhone. No dice. So far, Apple is having a hard time delivering on their promise here.
Well I was determined to give Apple the benefit of the doubt. I went ahead and subscribed to all my favorite podcasts in iTunes and synced them over to my iPhone.
<h2>Dichotomy</h2>
This is where I should stop and talk about the dichotomy that iTunes has always made between being subscribed to a podcast, and simply having some episodes of a podcast in your library. The dichotomy is so confusing it’s hard for me even to explain, but I’ll try. You see, if you put an episode of a podcast in your library, it will show up in the podcast area of iTunes as a podcast, but if you were not previously subscribed to that podcast, you still will not be after dropping that episode manually into iTunes. And telling whether you are or not is hard unless you are specifically looking for the signs. This means that you will not receive new episodes.
Well the same dichotomy is made when you sync podcasts that you subscribed to on the iPhone. Even though you subscribed to them there, and they synced to your iTunes library, you are not subscribed to them on your computer. This means episodes will not download in iTunes when they are available.
Okay, whatever, I can deal. It seems like a lot to ask from the average user, but I’m not an average user and I can deal.
But… this is where things get frustrating. After subscribing to several podcasts on my Mac and then syncing them over to my iPhone I made an interesting discovery. The same dichotomy is made on the iPhone that I just described for iTunes on the Mac. Those podcasts had all been synced over to the iPhone, but I was not subscribed to them on the iPhone.
<img src="http://buzzingpixel.com/images/uploads/IMG_0255.jpg" alt="IMG 0255" title="IMG_0255.jpg">
The fix is to go into each individual podcast’s settings and turn on the subscription button and enable automatic downloads. I’m subscribed to about 15 podcasts so this is quite frustrating. It’s about 6 taps per podcast.
This is perhaps the most frustrating user experience I have ever had the misfortune of seeing Apple design. They normally excel at user experience.
<h2>Playback Syncing</h2>
It’s pretty much nonexistent. I hear that it works between iOS devices so it appears that it simply does not sync playback position between OS X and iOS. This is downright silly and a major oversight on Apple’s part.
Even worse, played/unplayed status appears to only sync one way, from iTunes. This is far worse than what we previously had in this area. At least before played/unplayed, and playback position would sync between iTunes and iOS, even if only manually, via a standard iTunes sync. Now I can mark something as played, or listen all the way through, thereby marking it as played on iOS, and iTunes will not acknowledge that. Ever. Not over the air, not with a manual sync over Wi-Fi, or over sync cable.
<h2>Strange Interface Quirks</h2>
As much as I like some of the interface elements, there are some strange things going on. For instance, in tile mode you can’t access the “Unplayed” area that shows only episodes that have not been played. Sure you can switch to list view, but this seems like a major oversight. What’s more, when in tile view, which is a nice, and beautiful view, you cannot see which podcasts have new and unplayed episodes. Again, an amazing and egregious oversight. This makes tile view beautiful, and completely non-functional.
<img src="http://buzzingpixel.com/images/uploads/IMG_0256.jpg" alt="IMG 0256" title="IMG_0256.jpg">
(in this screen shot, Amplified has an unplayed episode, but I would never know in this view)
<h2>How do you refresh?</h2>
I will often see in my Twitter feed that a show that I love and am looking forward to listening to is available. When I see this, I usually immediately go to Instacast and refresh. Instacast pulls down the new episode. When this happened earlier today, I opened up the new Podcasts app and tried to find a way to refresh the feed. I couldn’t find a way to do it. Furthermore, the feed did not update on it’s own. I went over to Instacast, refreshed the feed, and sure enough, the new episode started downloading right away. Went back to the Podcasts app. Nothing. Another alarming oversight in the new app.
<h2>What I would be giving up</h2>
If I went with Apple’s “Podcasts” and switched away from Instacast I would essentially be gaining nothing. Because the reason I would have considered switching was if playback position would sync between iTunes and iOS. I spend as much time on my Mac, at my desk, as I do with my iPhone. Being able to seamlessly sync playback position between these two devices would be awesome. Since this doesn’t work as advertised, I get no features that Instacast does not now offer me.
But I would be losing several features that I love about Instacast.
Push Notifications. Instacast lets me know when new episodes are available via push, and the new app doesn’t have it.
Custom Subscriptions. Sometimes I want to subscribe to a podcast that is not in the iTunes directory, which requires me to copy and paste the feed URL. There is not a way that I could find to do this in the new app. Sure, you could wait until you were back at your computer and do it through iTunes. But this is another remarkable oversight.
UPDATE:
I <a href="https://twitter.com/chris4holland/status/218479355683287040">received a tweet letting me know</a> about a tip for subscribing to custom podcasts. I tested it and it does work, still clunky and unintuitive, but if you really want to use Podcasts to subscribe to a custom podcast URL, you can type or paste the URL into the search field of the library - not the catalog search - and you will be subscribed
Download Magagement. Instacast makes it amazingly simple to manage downloaded episodes. There’s a list called downloads. You go there to see what episodes are currently downloaded and you can delete them and whatnot. I could not find a way to do this in the new app. Sure, you can tell the app to auto delete older played episodes, but I actually couldn’t get this to work at all. The played episodes still stubbornly remain on the device.
Show Notes. Almost every podcast I listen to has show notes (usually a collection of links referenced throughout the show). And I often want to reference them during the show. Instacast displays them right in the app. I didn’t realize how often I used this feature. The new app does not have show notes/links.
Searching and Subscribing. I find Instacast to be far less clunky for this purpose, and it connects to the same podcast directory as the new app.
<h2>Still looking</h2>
I’m still looking for a better solution. If Instacast were available on the Mac with full syncing features that are available between iPad and iPhone Instacast, I think that would be what I need. As it is, I’m still looking. Podcasts is definitely not the app I was looking for.

Podcasts

<blockquote>
Version 3.0 of Reeder for iPhone is a major update. Not only are there a slew of new features, but there are an equal number of design improvements. The app has been completely re-written from the ground up and every corner of the UI has been refined. In short, Reeder runs better, looks better, does more, and is easier to use.
</blockquote>
Great review of a great iOS app. The only puzzling thing for me in the update was that none of the settings from 2.x were saved. I don’t get that at all. I understand why re-authentication with Google Reader would need to take place since things have changed with the way it interfaces with the Google API, but throwing out all the settings was a little bit much. But still, other than that it’s a great update.

Shawn Blanc

Shawn Blanc reviews Reeder 3

<blockquote>
Well, first off, I can carry it around in my pocket and jot down notes throughout the day. I keep lists on it. There’s always a running grocery list. And you know what? I don’t lose this list.
Right now we’re getting ready to go on a trip and I have check lists for everything that needs to be packed, or done before we leave. Hopefully this will cut down on pre-trip chaos and maybe I’ll get to come home to less of a disaster area. Maybe?
</blockquote>
…
<blockquote>
As it turns out though, the coolest thing about the ipod is the kindle app. I haven’t gotten a lot of reading done since Garrett’s birth. Juggling a book and a baby while nursing isn’t an easy feat (unless you don’t mind ripped books), but the ipod fits in the palm of one hand and turning the pages simply requires swiping a finger (usually a thumb actually) across the screen. I’ve been downloading and reading free e-books like crazy.
</blockquote>
She doesn’t even use it for music:
<blockquote>
Oh, and music? Well, ahem, any time I happen to go somewhere with my siblings, they ask if we can plug my ipod into the stereo and listen to some music. Maybe one of these days I’ll put some music on it so I can actually say yes to that request.
</blockquote>
The times are a-changin’. Steve Jobs really was right. Computers are trucks, tablets, smartphones, iPod touches etc. are cars. Sure some people prefer to drive trucks and so they do. But most prefer to drive cars, even if they have a truck. They drive their car unless they have a specific requirement for a truck, a specific task. My sister obviously prefers to drive her “car” (iPod Touch) and use her “truck” (computer) when she has a need to do so.

My sister (non-geek) on the usefulness of her iPod Touch

iPod Love

<blockquote>
iOS 6 brings to the table some of the biggest UI improvements Apple has made in the history of iOS. While some of the changes are obvious, some are more subtle. Here’s 25 new user interface changes in iOS 6.
</blockquote>
A fun video, but keep in mind this is just the first beta of iOS 6 and these things may change.
A couple comments: thank goodness pinstripes are being toned down! Even if it’s only in the Clock and Stocks app. I will not be sorry to see those garish pinstripes purged from the entire system.
And Bluetooth on the top level of the system preferences, thank goodness!
Also, to be nitpicky: he says blue status bars can be found throughout much of the system. It actually appears from other sources online that the status bar takes on a shade of the portion of the app closest to the status bar unless the developer has specifically coded the bar to be black.
Again, to nitpick, the settings icon is exactly the same, it has not been changed at all.
Still, a fun video.

Cult of Mac

25 UI Changes in iOS 6 Beta

As usual, Apple has a parade of iOS devices that get left in the dust when iOS 6 comes out. And just as usual, older devices that don’t get completely left behind still don’t get all the new features. And as always, some of the things on the list are obvious or really and actually limited by the hardware. Others leave you scratching your head.
<blockquote>
Flyover and turn-by-turn navigation will be available only on iPhone 4S and iPad 2 or later.
</blockquote>
This makes sense actually. I’m sure it requires a lot of horsepower under the hood.
<blockquote>
Siri will be available only on iPhone 4S and iPad (3rd generation)
</blockquote>
I kind of understand this. Siri needs a really good mic, and horsepower.
<blockquote>
Shared Photo Streams requires iOS 6 on iPhone 4 or later or iPad 2 or later
</blockquote>
Why?
<blockquote>
FaceTime over a cellular network requires iPhone 4S or iPad (3rd generation)
</blockquote>
Why?
<blockquote>
VIP list and VIP and Flagged smart mailboxes will be available on iPhone 4 or later and iPad 2 or later.
</blockquote>
Uh, WHY?!?
<blockquote>
Offline Reading List will be available on iPhone 4 or later and iPad 2 or later.
</blockquote>
WHY?!? WHY?!? WHY??? Do you really enjoy irritating users Apple? I know that you don’t, so why? <a href="#fn:leftbehindfn1">1</a>
<blockquote>
Made for iPhone hearing aids require iPhone 4S.
</blockquote>
Not enough information to scream about this one.
Like I said, a couple of these make sense, and others… not so much.
<hr>
<ol>
<li>Not that I really care since I won’t be giving up Instapaper anytime soon. But it’s the principle of the thing. <a href="#fnref:leftbehindfn1">↩</a></li>
</ol>

Posts tagged “iOS” from the blog